Manual vs. computer-assisted coding

  • Does using the 3M™ 360 Encompass™ System mean an improved case mix index? Yes, it does.

How sure are we?

The statistics speak for themselves. A blind study shows with 95 percent certainty that a hospital on board with 3M 360 Encompass will have a positive shift between 0.0102 and 0.2069 in its CMI.¹

Icons of a hospital + 3M 360 Encompass = a positive shift in CMI

  • What does that mean to a bottom line?

    That kind of CMI shift would mean an annual impact between $378K and $7.7M.

  • And how does 3M’s CAC (computer-assisted coding) compare with manual methods?

    The clients working with our CAC the majority of the time are more likely to see a CMI increase than those relying on manual coding methods.²,³

Manual methods CMI

Bar chart showing increased CMI using 3M CAC vs. manual methods

More resources

Ready to take the next step?

Let’s work together to optimize your organization. Send us a message or speak to a 3M representative at 1-800-367-2447 (available weekdays 7 a.m. to 3 p.m. CT).

Connect with us

Discover the inspiration and information you’re looking for on the health care topics that matter most.

  • ¹ Findings based on a blind comparison of randomly selected 3M clients and non-clients, using 2015 MEDPAR data. ² Findings based on 2014 and 2015 MEDPAR data comparison of manual coding vs. 3M’s CAC technology. ³ Findings documented in the December 2016 3M Health Information Systems white paper entitled, “Do hospitals using the 3M™ 360 Encompass™ System experience an increase in case mix index performance?”.